Something to cogitate;

It seems that there may be something in Venus’ Birkeland currents affecting the Earth’s mass – it is more of a potato-shape than before.  This could give rise to various orbital re-arrangements but perhaps not of great significance.  In other words a catastrophic view is OK.  The Moment of Inertia tensor can be for any of the following events finely-balanced i.e. it is enough for Earth to go through the Venus electric currents and as gravity is an electric phenomenon for there to be a gravity dipole effect leading to a Mass shift sufficient for an IITPW z-axis to y-axis flip, etc.

We list the events as a series that are related to each other.  The basic relation operating is that of the 243-year cycle of same –plane inferior conjunctions.  I believe that this is expressed as Transit A 8 years Transit B 105.5 years Transit C 8 years Transit D 121.5 years.

NB the Flood occurs in CUT chronology on day 1, second month, -3327 (or converted according to Barry Setterfield’s work to 829.13 Ma).

EVENT 1:

-3327 Transit A of a randomly-set up cycle of Venusian-Earth conjunctions – to suit this argument.

EVENT 2:

-2347 Transit B (4 cycles later) Mr Dodwell’s paper’s Axis Tilt

EVENT 3:

-1869 and -1861 Transit A and Transit B (2 cycles later) as observed by Ammi-zaduga (CUT chronology used to establish the reign of Ammi-zaduga.)

Notes;

1.       I am advised by Barry, in a personal communication, that Mr Dodwell’s -2345 error bars would allow for -2347. 

2.       The case for a chronology of Babylon 1 Dynasty that meets the requirement above for Ammi-zaduga to observe both transits and take up Kingship in a sole reign on Transit B can be made as follows;

a.Hammurabi                                                     -2008

b.Samsu-iluna                                                   -1965

c.Abi-eshuh                                                        -1927

d.Ammi-ditana                                                  -1899

e.Abi-eshuh cf. Pesgaldaramash                               -1896

f.Ammi-zaduga & Ammi-ditana                 -1871*

g.Ammi-zaduga                                                                -1862

h.Samsu-ditana                                                                -1849

i.cf. Aidarakalamma & end of Ammi-ditana  -1846

j.Samsu-ditana                                                  -1841

k.cf. Ekurulanna & end of Samsu-ditana                -1818

End of Samsu-ditana and Kassites            -1815

*We should note the regnal Year of the Golden Throne  in the reign of Ammi-zaduga is unknown so we can speculate that it is Year 10 or Transit B in this cycle;  if we subtract 1900 from -1861 (-1869 +8=-1861) we get -3761 or the benchmark for the molad of Tishri.

3.       CUT chronology allows the following

-2349     En-anna-tum I (alt.start), grandson of Ur-Nanshe, king, took Sumer awAmmi-zadugaay from Enshagkushana of Uruk and repulsed the armies of Kish, Elam and Mari (this was during the 400 yrs of Ur-Zababa and his "dynasty")  Enshagkushana  throws the Elamites out of Awan earlier in this year.                                    

-2349     Mamagal, the boatman               in Kish – I think, and can check

Was this done in anticipation of a Venus event?

We should finalize with comment that the current cycle of Venusian transits is mis-aligned to the above construct by 16 years.

Big Dump re Durupinar is coming soon

Hi,

Best to keep up is to go to Geology/Chronology Flood Stuff.

Regards,
elderlyrstaff

A Forum has been established to further, in part, Chronology/Geology connections

Go to

http://thewayoflife.freeforums.net/thread/12/unconnected-new-geology-items

http://thewayoflife.freeforums.net/thread/6/ancient-history-geology-ready-reckoners

http://thewayoflife.freeforums.net/thread/5/grand-canyon-geology

http://thewayoflife.freeforums.net/thread/2/ancient-history

There is also other stuff yet to come.  Keep in mind repeated and ongoing ridiculous attacks on my computer system mean that I have lost heart in updating with new changes.  I am very discouraged since no-one has come to my (CUT's) aid.  How sad.  What fearful people live on Earth today.

Regards,
elderlyrstaff

Check Out the Red Dates

Keeping in mind -3146 as an important - s/s fragment

-3146

En-dara-ana co-rules with Nan-gish-lishma+

 and -3117 to -3115 Babel; -3016 the end of En-mer-kar (Nimrod version one); etc we have, courtesy of Jonathan Gray, the following;

Note the dates in RED.  Thery are converted from radiometric years to orbital years (see Barry and Penny Setterfield).

You may wonder. Have traces of actual human
beings been found in the wrong places? 
Definitely - yes.
For starters, human footprints are found in
undisturbed strata of virtually all geological
“ages”
yes, they've been unearthed in rock layers
where the so-called “earliest” life forms appear.
Here are some examples:
* Gobi Desert:  A print of a ribbed sole (shoe or
sandal size 9), in sandstone rock said to be
“2 million years old.” -2899
* Fisher Canyon, Nevada:  A shoe print with clear
traces of strong thread, in a coal seam “12 million
years old.” -2903/04
* Pershing County, Nevada:  A shoe print, showing
evidence of a well-cut and double-stitched leather
sole, in Triassic limestone “160 to 195 million years old.” -2982/-3006
This find was authenticated by a competent geologist
of the Rockefeller Foundation in New York. 
The thread is smaller than any used by shoemakers
today. 
The discoverer took it to New York.  He took it to
Columbia University.  He showed it to some of the
leading people at the American Museum of Natural
History and turned it over to them. 
But you can write to the American Museum of Natural
History - and they’ll tell you the report is not
in their files.  (I wonder why?)
Anyway, here are some more finds:
* Cow Canyon, Nevada (25 miles east of Lovelock):  The
graceful imprint of a well-balanced human in a coal
vein of the Tertiary “period.”
* England:  A shoe imprint with nail heads around its
outer edge, in “450 million year old” limestone. -3138
* Antelope Springs, Utah:  Prints of a man wearing
shoes, in which the left foot had trodden on a
trilobite, a creature of “440 million years ago.”-3136/37
   This Utah discovery was made in the Wheeler Formation,
in the House Range east of Antelope Springs, in
shaley limestone rock. 
Prints included one of a child’s foot, with all five
toes showing dimly.
On June 1, 1968, William Meister was looking for
trilobite fossils.  With difficulty, he was climbing
a 2000 ft high rock face. 
He paused, and broke off a 2 inch thick lump of rock
with his geology hammer.  It opened like a book,
revealing a trilobite in the heel of a sandal print. 
A consulting geologist was called in.  He found more
sandal-prints and some footprints of bare-foot children. 
It would seem from this evidence that mankind and
trilobites co-existed.
* Laetolil, Africa:  Footprints in rock “12 million
years old.”  -2903/04
* Tulsa, Oklahoma:  Footprints in rock “12 million
years old.”  -2903/04
* Carson City, Nevada:  Sandal prints in Pliocene
“age” rock “12 million years old.” -2903/04
* Glen Rose, Texas:  Footprints in Cretaceous rock
“70 million years old.”  -2936
* Mt. Victoria, Australia:  Footprint in Triassic
rock “200 million years old.”  -3007
* St. Louis, Missouri:  Footprints in Permian rock
“200 million years old.”  -3007
* Bera, Kentucky:  Footprints in Pennsylvanian
rock “200 million years old.”  -3007
* Lake Windermere, England:  Sandal print in
Ordovician rock “400 million years old.”  -3113
Okay, I don't want to bore you.  Examples are
almost countless.
Do you notice something wrong with these
discoveries? That's right. They contradict
evolutionary geology.
EVOLUTIONARY THEORY IN TROUBLE?
 If human footprints in ancient rocks are genuine,
then either men existed before evolution says they
should, or our dating systems are in serious error.
As James Madsen, curator of Earth Science at the
University of Utah, stated for the press, concerning
the trilobite-with-man find:
“There’s something of a problem here, since
trilobites and humans are separated by millions of
years”  (in theory, over 200 million!).
Indeed, this intimate simultaneous occurrence of
modern (sandal-shod) man with “primitive” trilobites
is a serious problem for the evolution theory.
FAKE "FOOTPRINTS", MAYBE?
Well, you ask, could these tracks be fakes?   That's
a fair question.
Sorry, but many of these prints were found “inside”
stratified deposits, where forgery was impossible. 
You see, they were found only after removal of
overlying rock strata. ...

Interesting?  You bet. Especially relevant to Pleistocene from -2898 to -2897.

Enjoy.

'Grief from deadbeats' overwhelms our ability to function for a while

A violent attack upon my computing resources has brought a change of effort in CUT's work and we have to temporarily suspend output.

A Better Re-run

Rerun of Dynasty One

This short paper looks at all sources, including archaeology, and reconciles all. CUT chronology is the basis for all dating. The start for Menes is obtained from clearing-uptimes.blogspot.com.au.
The tectonic connections are treated in various papers – some at academia.edu.
Its a short ride, relies on an understanding of CUT charting techniques (see academia.edu) and is insufferably notey or not proper prose.

I don't take associations made at Wikipedia for A 1 to A 8 or Abydos kings 1-8 for granted.

The Ethiopians or southerners took the north in a series of battles so we should see certain connections and we do. We need to reference the Demi-gods as well and we do that too in CUT chronology.

-2781 Nakehte Kalnis,son of Abd Shems

-2770 Gannkam

-2752 Hohey

-2741 Kasiyope (queen)

-2722 Sabe I

-2639 end of En-mer-kar and start of Lugal-Banda (in Mesopotamia)

-2620 GarIak II

We shall attack this issue of the First Dynasty by looking at extant sources, then CUT's Public Service (PS) reconstruction and finally apply our CUT-charting tools. The Abydos king list holds true for the flow in this new order and is most comforting in this respect.

Thirty-year sed cycles will be winkled out.

Eratosthenes.

He is, of course, “all over the place” in our terms I.e. of prince A following prince B immediately etc. However, we ignore Eratosthenes at our very great peril. So we, sensibly, will not ignore Eratosthenes.

Menes -2873 to -2811

Athothis -2811 to -2752 or -2813 to -2754 (the rise of Zemti A5 or Merneith's regency)

Athothis II -2741 to -2709 or -2743 to -2711

Uennephes -2752 to -2710

Miebis -2690 to -2671

Pemphos -2664 to -2646

We should now visit anno mundi 2900, etc. The dynasty is Theban. Theban is 18^th dynasty as far as Eratosthenes is concerned. Theban is Nubian in latter 18^th/early 19^th dynasties. Makeda is the last of her line in Nubia. She ends -1209. Osorkon II can be associated with Nubia and Thebes . He ends -1207. Now anno mundi 3045 can be guessed at. Working BACKWARDS, never a good idea, we can build the following equations

1. -1207-3045 = -4252.
2. -1611 -2900 = -4511 Eus.

Points to consider re dating above;

1. Flood -3326-969 (little green book-Loeb Classic Series) -4295 Eus. Correction is 48 yrs - see academia.edu for an endless diatribe on this topic. -4295+48=-4247 (Talmudists). Cf. -4252 will develop later.
2. AM (real 7 days of Creation) to Adam is 1058 yrs
3. Eus. And Afr. provide two numbers 2242 and 2262 for “Adam to Flood”.
4. AM Afr. -5589 and AM Eus. -5569 reflect above divergence. By equating, in a playful way, Adam and real Creation we can discover that Adam was created in -5589 + 1058 = -4531 Afr. And -5569 + 1058 = -4511 Eus. QED.
5. -1611 is as follows; Gebel Tjauti Rock Inscription 11, 290 days drift + Heliopolitan corection which is 1 day earlier / 4 degrees of Lattitude = 294. Years corresponding are counted from the DD of Demi-God Ammon's sed renewal in -2787. So -2787 +4*294 = -1611 cf. Kahun and Ebers.
   6. Djer is said to have a heliacal rising; Wikipedia; lets try -2787 or Year 1 or 1 following an accession year of Djer and see it looks good.

The interesting question is why Eratosthenes has started Theban dynastic history at Menes not Ahmose I. Probably scene-setting.

Next cab off the rank is Africanus (Manetho's Epitome).

But first lets do a Public Service review or model.

Demi-Gods;

Heracles -2888 to -2818

Ammon -2818 to -2748

…..

Zeus -2729 to -2709

Pre- or Dynastic;

Menes -2873 to -2811

Edjo -2811 to -2741

Teti -2813 to -2743

Djer -2789 to -2719

Iti=Kenkenes -2784 to -2711 or -2784 to -2709

Mer-neith -2781 to -2711

Ita=Uennephes -2770 to -2700

Den=Usaphais =Zemti -2749 to -2679

Semempses -2719 to -2647

Sneferka -2789 to -2719

Seket -2709 to -2639

Miebis -2705 to -2631 (regnal count from -2700)

Qa'a=Kaa=Bieneches -2680 to -2610

Kebh=Kourodes -2671 to -2601

Hotepsekhemwy=Boethos -2657 to -2562

Kaiechos=Kakau -2631 to -2561

Horus: Bird? -2620 to -2566 (short of a full term)

Banetjeru=Binothris -2611 to -2516 or -2515

Seth-Peribsen -2589 to -2519

Nubnefer -2581 to -2516

Sekhemyeb Perenmae -2567 to -2497

Tlas=Wadjnes -2552 to -2482

Weneg -2545 to -2475

T 2.22 Ba? -2536 to -2466

Aristarchos=Za -2516 to -2445

Senedj -2506 to -2436

Kara -2498 to -2428

Neferkare -2745 to -2394 in two goes

Neferkasokar -2475 to -2405

Djadjay -2437 to -2367

Hudjefa -2428 to -2394

Bebti -2413 to -2367

Sesochris=Momchieri -2434 to -2355

Cheneres=Khasekhemwy -2395 to -2325

From ;http://www.ancient-egypt.org/_v3d/index.html we have

“The succession of the first three kings of the 2nd Dynasty is found on the back of the right shoulder of the statue of a priest named Hotepdief as follows: Hotepsekhemwi, Nebre and Ninetjer.”

Africanus

Menes -2873 to -2811

Athothis -2811 to -2754

Kenkenes -2754 to -2723

Uenephes -2723 to -2700

Usaphais -2710 to -2690

Miebis -2690 to -2664

Semempses -2664 to -2646

Bieneches -2646 to -2620

NB -2873+253=-2620

Eusebius

Menes -2873 to -2813

Athothis -2789 to -2762

Kenkenes -2762 to -2723

Uenephes -2752 to -2710

Usaphais -2710 to -2690

Miebis -2690 to -2664

Semempses -2664 to -2646

Bieneches -2649 to -2621

NB -2873+252=-2621

Book of Sothis

Athothis -2782 to -2754

Kenkenes -2762 to -2723

Uennephes -2752 to -2710

Palermo Stone in three fragments Oxford, Cairo C5 and main.

Usaphais (Den) -2745 to -2711

Miebdis -2690 to -2664

Pemphos -2657 (incl. Coronation year – joint with Hotepsekhemwy) -2657 to -2646

Tory's sed cycle – does it exist in Dynasty #1 of Egypt?

-2858, -2843, -2788, -2783(?), -2781, -2751, -2740, -2718, -2689, -2670, -2660, -2649, -2627

QED sed.

Are there any keys, daisy-chains, post-keys or follow-ons (end-to-ends)?

Djer keys the demi-god Ammon,

Iti=Kenkenes keysTeti,

Athothis (Book of Sothis) keys Edjo

Merneith post-keys Edjo

Uennephes (Book of Sothis/Eus) keys Merneith

Den daisy-chains Ammon, demi-god

One regnal count of Den keys Uennephes

A second regnal count starts with a second regnal count for Uennephes – no joy here though

Athothis II (Eratos.) follows-on Teti; ending one regnal count co-terminal with Uennephes which leads CUT to wonder whether Uenephes – a child, in -2762 of 8 years; a youth, in -2752 of 18 years – had a regent, his mother from her renewal sed, till he reached 47 yrs in -2723. His majority coming in -2742 cf. -2743 he is the 're-incarnation' of the now defunct and probably dead Athothis. Sounds a bit familiar doesn't it?

Semempses keys Den's sed

Den follows-on on two regnal starts a) Uennephes - sort of - and b) Kenkenes really

Den and Uennephes 'sort of' parallel rule, -2710 to -2700, includes the end of Djer in -2705 and a five year hiatus before a regnal count for Miebis because Miebis followed-on Djer.

Miebis follows-on in -2700 Kenkenes

Den now kicks on without Uennephes till -2690 when Miebis sort of keys Semempses and Sneferka actually keys Semempses

Qa'a daisy-chains Den in -2780

Even though we can picture Kebh as keying Miebis he really doesn't start a regnal count till the end of Miebis' second repeat sed. At which time Semempses and Kebh joint-rule

Semempses seems to have set up Boethos Hotepsekhemwy as a counter to Miebis in -2757 – possibly a political or dynastic move

Horus Bird follows-on Sneferka

Banetjeru daisy-chains Qa'a

Kakau follows-on Miebis

Seth-Peribsen post-keys Horus: Bird

So what can we say in summary?

The “destruction of Egypt” of Semempses Year 1 record is the same as Boethos' “great calamity”. That is to say a huge earthquake – remember the continents, at this time (orbital see Setterfield), have not long assumed their almost modern tectonic placements – at Bubastis wiped out a good portion of the populace in -2656. This placed the second dynasty at the crossroads. From -2620 dynasty one is no more but a new dynasty and a renewed Egypt are on the go starting with Boethos in -2627. The first prince born into - or who was only small at the time of Bubastis - this new world is Kakau and he assumes power in a sort of follow-on (CUT sometimes ues the term 'end-to-end') from Kebh in -2601.

The beginning of the dynasty saw the passing of the baton from the demi-gods to the dynastic era kings. We can weave, however inexpertly, nearly all the 'known' kings into our dynasty one tapestry. The prevailing notion is one of orderly but not uniform transition from king to king. The lesson of Den (regnal count - Palermo Stone fragments, The Oxford fragment - 4^th -2745, 5^th -2744, 6^th -2743, 7^th -2742; regnal count - The Cairo-Stone fragment C5 18^th -2723, 19^th -2722, 20^th -2721, 21st -2720, 22^nd -2219) shows us the multiplicity of regnal counts for one king. Mostly representing co-rules till some significant point of transition e.g. the end of a 70-year period of public service – not all as top dog.

Merneith (mother of Djet and Den) see Wiki item re two “cartouches” for Mother of King, Athothis and Uennephes definitely have the smell of another go of Osiris, Isis, Horus etc. Whether a recycle or what, we see at least the outline of a pattern of historical events that are by our Creator recycled.

We should note in connection with long reigns in TC which receive so much derision, in the literature, that Biblical patriarch contemporaries such as Heber , Peleg and Reu ruled 80 years, 52 years (-2818 to -2766) and 132 years respectively -see CUT chronology. So Djer's 84 years is WELL within the bounds of reality.

The Palermo Stone gives the following series of Kings in the view of CUT chronology. From Breasted;

First Dynasty King T = Djer (Breasted, vol I, p.57 line 92 is 6 months 7 days – in funny talk this is Peret III, day 7 cf. Wikipedia article re calendar entry (unspecifed) “death of Djer on Peret III, day 7” QED); King U = Kenkenes = Iti NB: from a DD of -3174 cf. Noah, 103 days drift brings us to -2762 the first year of a Kenkenes regnal count (Book of Sothis/Eus.); Lost kings (incl. Den = Usaphais = Zemti etc); King V = Djet (Uennephes =Ita);

Second Dynasty King Neterimu = Banetjeru = Binothris; Lost kings; King W = Chaires = Kara; King X = Djadjay.

These lead us to point out that Wikipedia on Den includes a portion of Palermo Stone 28^th...41^st year which belong to Uenephes as 28^th -2743, 29^th -2742 etc. The thirty-one years could possibly be thirty-two years. NB a small research opportunity exists to find Year 32. This is also Athothis II of Eratosthenes.

Missing Years?

The Abydos King List remains intact, in the sense of there are no years 'missing' from the start year of first king to the end date of the last king;

Menes -2873 to -2811

Teti -2813 to -2743

Iti -2784 to -2714

Ita -2770 to -2700

Septi (Zemti) -2749 to -2679

Meribiap -2705 to -2631

Semsu -2719 to -2647

Qebeh -2671 to -2601

Sakkhara King List is intact, in the sense of there are no years 'missing' from the start year of first king to the end date of the last king;

Miebis -2705 to -2631

Kourodes -2671 (-2664) to -2601

End of Dynasty One /Start of Dynasty Two Controversy

To reconcile Eus./and Armenian recension we have the following;

Eus. 297 years, and 549 from “beginning” Arm. 297 years

Dealing with 549 years. Mestraim in Book of Sothis is equated to Menes. CUT puts Mestraim/Menes at -2846. Therefore we can sum -2846 + 549 to -2297 or Tosorthros of Eus/Afr. Dynasty #3 in CUT chronology. OR, we can sum as follows; -2873 + 549 = -2324. This works if Gosiormes / Hotepsekhemwy has a PS of -2394 to -2324 as opposed to -2395 to -2325. This is actually a 'better' PS in this model. In other words Eus. Confirms Afr. - maybe for the first time!!

The 297 of Eus. is Kebh as the first Dynasty #2 king (remember Eus. is a pest of a pedant) or -2664 + 297 = -2367 or the end of Bebty, in CUT chronology, and also the end of the royal line.

A Rerun of Dynasty Two

We should note that there is little consistency as to whether the regnal count at a key is from the key or post-key year e.g. Nubnefer keys Banetjeru in -2581/-2580 – his Year 30. He could start a regnal count in -2580 i.e. Year 1 of this regnal count is -2581/-2580 OR he could start in -2579 i.e. Year 1 of this regnal count is -2580/-2579. If he takes the first option then his sed year is -2552/-2551. Tlas is set down as a key to Nubnefer ie his Public Service (PS) runs -2552 to -2482 (assuming as CUT has a model PS). The Palermo Stone material for Banetjeru has a 7^th year entry in -2581/-2580 and a 8^th year entry in -2580/-2579. In other words Banetjeru has a parallel or Joint rule with Nubnefer. However the 36^th to 44^th year is a standard regnal count for Banetjeru from his sed -2580/-2579. The 36^th Year coincidentally corresponds to the first Year of Weneg – assuming he is not Tlas.

Another way of illustrating this principle is with Horus: Bird (CUT) -2621 daisy-chains Sneferka (CUT) -2690 to -2620. In -2589 Seth-Peribsen (CUT) post-keys Bird. Thus Bird, in this model, would have started a regnal count in -2619 or he opted to post-key Seket's (-2650 to -2580) sed. Remember Seket in this model would have keyed Ka'a and may have started a regnal count in -2649. We should note that Baunetjer's 95 years were somewhat of an extra beyond Year 70. In other words Banetjeru's first Palermo Stone regnal count started (-2587) in an end-to-end anticipation of his retirement – but it didn't happen!

We can take a further look at the predictive value of the model. When the end of Banetjeru comes in -2515 then Sesthenes comes to light He rules 70 yrs (end-to-end) from -2515 to -2445. Stoichos of Eratosthenes is our confounding element. He rules, in an end-to-end from Tlas (-2552 to -2482), from -2482 to -2412 thus providing a daisy-chain to Neferkasokar in -2413 – an IMPORTANT date or DD. Senedj has a regnal count from -2482. The problem with this arrangement is that it does not lead to a -2873+555= -2318 end of Dynasty One and Two. My conclusion is 555 it is just a check-digit.

From Kim Ryholt, p.7 of 21, “The Turin King-List”, academia.edu, Dec 25, 2014; 3:48 am we have

... Heading for the Ist-I0th Dynasties (3.10)

" [Kings of the house of (?) king Menes."

Summation for the 1st-5th Dynasties (4.26)

"Total of kings from Menes until [Unas: x amounting to

767 (or 768) years . J "

Summation for the 6th-8th Dynasties (5.14-15)

" [Total of] kings [until Neferirkare: xJ amounting to 181

years, 6 months, 3 days, and a lacuna of 6 (years). Total:

1 [87 years, 6 months, and 3 days J . "

Summation for the Ist-8th Dynasties (5.15-17)

" [Total ofJ kings37 [fromJ Menes; their kingship, their

years, and a lacuna [thereto J : 9 [ 4J 9 years and 15 days, and

a lacuna of 6 years. Total: [x kings amounting toJ 955

years and 1 [5 J days." ….

Operating on the basis of the Exodus year (-1580 to -1579) for CUT chronology purposes we can have the following material to digest or throw-up.

From -1580 backwards according to 1st-5th Dynasties (4.26) total i.e. by 768 years we come to -2348 the SECOND AXIS tilt. By going forward to Ist-8th Dynasties (5.15-17) total we arrive at -1393 cf. Harmessus Miamum. By going backwards from -1393 according to 6th-8th Dynasties (5.14-15) i.e. by 187 years we come to -1580. To conclude then Dynasty 1-5 ends at Exodus and Dynasty 6-8 starts at Exodus. CUT is in error on this point. Africanus gives 146 years for Dynasty #6 i.e. -1625 to -1479.

That's it for our revision to date for Dynasty One of Egypt.

Post-Script

It is possible that Djer is Kenkenes = Iti.  He would have started his sed regnal count with Aha = Teti = Athothis' keyed sed in -2784.  Nothing particularly stands in the way of a -2705 end as opposed to -2714.  In this way we can validate king Qa'a seal list of kings i.e.  Narmer, Aha, Djer, Djet, Den, Anedjib, Semerkhet and Qáa from Ottar Vendel's great website Ottar Vendel Sun Dec 21 9:28 PM AEST

 Menes -2873 to -2811, Athothis -2813 to -2754, Kenkenes -2762 to -2723, Uenephes -2754 to -2700, Usaphais -2710 to -2690, Miebis -2690 to -2671, Semempses -2664 to -2646, Bieneches -2649 to -2621 [gaps are fully-covered in the full treatment] /and validate king Den's list of kings i.e. Narmer, Aha, Djer, Djet, Den, Meretneit

 Menes -2873 to -2811, Athothis -2813 to -2754, Kenkenes -2762 to -2723, Uenephes -2754 to -2700, Usaphais -2723 to -2718, Merneith -2781 to -2711

-----The End (not of me, quite yet)-----

Correction to Dynasty One

Rerun of Dynasty One

I don't take associations made at Wikipedia for A 1 to A 8 or Abydos kings 1-8.

The Ethiopians or southerners took the north in a series of battles so we should see certain connections and we do. We need to reference the Demi-gods as well and we do that too in CUT chronology.

-2781 Nakehte Kalnis,son of Abd Shems

-2770 Gannkam

-2752 Hohey

-2741 Kasiyope (queen)

-2722 Sabe I

-2639 end of En-mer-kar and start of Lugal-Banda (in Mesopotamia)

-2620 GarIak II

We shall attack this by looking at each source, then Public Service (PS) and finally apply our tools. Abydos holds true for the flow in this new order.

Thirty-year sed cycles will be winkled out.

Eratosthenes. He is, of course, “all over the place” in our terms of prince A following prince B immediately etc. However, we ignore Eratosthenes at our very great peril. So we, sensibly, will not ignore Eratosthenes.

Menes -2873 to -2811

Athothis -2811 to -2752 or -2813 to -2754 (the rise of Zemti A5 or Merneith's regency)

Athothis II -2741 to -2709 or -2743 to -2711

Uennephes -2752 to -2710

Miebis -2690 to -2671

Pemphos -2664 to -2646

We should now visit anno mundi 2900, etc. The dynasty is Theban. Theban is 18^th dynasty as far as Eratosthenes is concerned. Theban is Nubian in latter 18^th/early 19^th dynasties. Makeda is the last of her line in Nubia. She ends -1209. Osorkon II can be associated with Nubia and Thebes . He ends -1207. Now anno mundi 3045 can be guessed at. Working BACKWARDS -1207-3045 = -4252. -1611 -2900 = -4511 Eus.

Points to consider re dating above;

1. Flood -3326-969 (little green book) -4295 Eus. Correction is 48 yrs - see academia.edu for an endless diatribe on this topic. -4295+48=-4247 (Talmudists). Cf. -4252 will develop later.
2. AM (real 7 days of Creation) to Adam is 1058 yrs
3. Eus. And Afr. provide two numbers 2242 and 2262 for “Adam to Flood”.
4. AM Afr. -5589 and AM Eus. -5569 reflect above divergence. By equating, in a playful way, Adam and real Creation we can discover that Adam was created in -5589 + 1058 = -4531 Afr. And -5569 + 1058 = -4511 Eus. QED.
5. -1611 is as follows; Gebel Tjauti Rock Inscription 11, 290 days drift + Heliopolitan corection which is 1day earlier / 4 degrees of Lattitude = 294. Years corresponding are counted from the DD of Demi-God Ammon's sed renewal in -2787. So -2787 +4*294 = -1611 cf. Kahun and Ebers.

The interesting question is why Eratosthenes has started Theban dynastic history at Menes not Ahmose I. Probably scene-setting.

Next cab off the rank is Africanus (Manetho's Epitome).

But first lets do a Public Service review or model.

Demi-Gods;

Heracles -2888 to -2818

Ammon -2818 to -2748

Pre- or Dynastic;

Menes -2873 to -2811

Edjo -2811 to -2741

Teti -2813 to -2743

Djer -2789 to -2719

Iti=Kenkenes -2784 to -2711 or -2784 to -2709

Mer-neith -2781 to -2711

Ita=Uennephes -2770 to -2700

Den=Usaphais =Zemti-2749 to -2679

Semempses -2719 to -2647

Sneferka -2789 to -2719

Miebis -2705 to -2631 (regnal count from -2700)

Qa'a=Kaa -2680 to -2610

Kebh=Kourodes -2671 to -2601

Kaiechos=Kakau -2631 to -2561

Horus: Bird? -2620 to -2566 (short of a full term)

Banetjeru=Binothris -2611 to -2516 or -2515

Seth-Peribsen -2589 to -2519

Nubnefer -2581 to -2516

Sekhemyeb Perenmae -2567 to -2497

Tlas=Wadjnes -2552 to -2482

Weneg -2545 to -2475

T 2.22 Ba? -2536 to -2466

Aristarchos=Za -2516 to -2445

Senedj -2506 to -2436

Kara -2498 to -2428

Neferkare -2745 to -2394 in two goes

Neferkasokar -2475 to -2405 or

Djadjay -2437 to -2367

Hudjefa -2428 to -2394

Bebti -2413 to -2367

Sesochris=Momchieri -2434to -2355

Cheneres=Khasekhemwy -2395 to -2325

From ;http://www.ancient-egypt.org/_v3d/index.html we have

“The succession of the first three kings of the 2nd Dynasty is found on the back of the right shoulder of the statue of a priest named Hotepdief as follows: Hotepsekhemwi, Nebre and Ninetjer.”

Africanus forsooth.

Menes -2873 to -2811

Athothis -2811 to -2754

Kenkenes -2754 to -2723

Uenephes -2723 to -2700

Usaphais -2710 to -2690

Miebis -2690 to -2664

Semempses -2664 to -2646

Bieneches -2646 to -2620

NB -2873+253=-2620

Eusebius forsooth forsooth!.

Menes -2873 to -2813

Athothis -2789 to -2762

Kenkenes -2762 to -2723

Uenephes -2752 to -2710

Usaphais -2710 to -2690

Miebis -2690 to -2664

Semempses -2664 to -2646

Bieneches -2649 to -2621

NB -2873+252=-2621

Book of Sothis – relax.

Athothis -2782 to -2754

Kenkenes -2762 to -2723

Uennephes -2752 to -2710

Palermo Stone in three fragments Oxford, Cairo C5 and main.

Usaphais (Den) -2745 to -2711

Miebdis -2690 to -2664

Pemphos -2657 (incl. Coronation year – joint with Hotepsekhemwy) -2657 to -2646

Tory's sed cycle – does it exist in Dynasty #1 of Egypt?

-2858, -2843, -2788, -2783(?), -2781, -2751, -2740, -2718, -2689, -2670, -2660, -2649, -2627

QED sed.

Are there any keys, daisy-chains, post-keys or follow-ons?

Djer keys the demi-god Ammon,

Iti=Kenkenes keysTeti,

Athothis (Book of Sothis) keys Edjo

Merneith post-keys Edjo

Uennephes (Book of Sothis/Eus) keys Merneith

Den daisy-chains Ammon, demi-god

One regnal count of Den keys Uennephes

A second regnal count starts with a second regnal count for Uennephes – no joy here though

Athothis II (Eratos.) follows-on Teti; ending one regnal count co-terminal with Uennephes which leads CUT to wonder whether Uenephes – a child, in -2762 of 8 years; a youth, in -2752 of 18 years – had a regent, his mother from her renewal sed, till he reached 40 yrs or command of the army stage in -2723. His majority coming in -2742 cf. -2743 he is the 're-incarnation' of the now defunct and probably dead Athothis. Sounds a bit familiar doesn't it?

Semempses keys Den's sed

Den follows-on on two regnal starts a) Uennephes - sort of - and b) Kenkenes really

Den and Uennephes 'sort of' parallel rule, -2710 to -2700, includes the end of Djer in -2705 and a five year hiatus before a regnal count for Miebis because Miebis followed-on Djer.

Miebis follows-on in -2700 Kenkenes

Den now kicks on without Uennephes till -2690 when Miebis sort of keys Semempses and Sneferka actually keys Semempses

Qa'a daisy-chains Den in -2780

Even though we can picture Kebh as keying Miebis he really doesn't start a regnal count till the end of Miebis' second repeat sed. At which time Semempses and Kebh joint-rule

Semempses seems to have set up Boethos Hotepsekhemwy as a counter to Miebis in -2757 – possibly a political or dynastic move

Horus Bird follows-on Sneferka

Banetjeru daisy-chains Qa'a

Kakau follows-on Miebis

Seth-Peribsen post-keys Horus: Bird

So what can we say in summary?

The “destruction of Egypt” of Semempses Year 1 record is the same as Boethos' “great calamity”. That is to say a huge earthquake – remember the continents have not long assumed their modern tectonic placements – at Bubastis wiped out a good portion of the populace in -2656. This placed the second dynasty at the crossroads. From -2620 dynasty one is no more but a new dynasty and a renewed Egypt are on the go starting with Boethos in -2627. The first prince born into - or who was only small at the time of Bubastis - this new world is Kakau and he assumes power in a sort of follow-on (CUT sometimes ues the term 'end-to-end') from Kebh in -2601.

The beginning of the dynasty saw the passing of the baton from the demi-gods to the dynastic era kings. We can weave, however inexpertly, nearly all the 'known' kings into our dynasty one tapestry. The prevailing notion is one of orderly but not uniform transition from king to king. The lesson of Den (regnal count - Palermo Stone fragments, The Oxford fragment - 4^th -2745, 5^th -2744, 6^th -2743, 7^th -2742; regnal count - The Cairo-Stone fragment C5 18^th -2723, 19^th -2722, 20^th -2721, 21st -2720, 22^nd -2219) shows us the multiplicity of regnal counts for one king. Mostly representing co-rules till some significant point of transition e.g. the end of a 70-year period of public service – not all as top dog.

Merneith (mother of Djet and Den) see Wiki item re two “cartouches” for Mother of King, Athothis and Uennephes definitely have the smell of another go of Osiris, Isis, Horus etc. Whether a recycle or what, we see at least the outline of a pattern of historical events that are by our Creator recycled.

We should note in connection with long reigns in TC which receive so much derision, in the literature, that Biblical patriarch contemporaries such as Heber , Peleg and Reu ruled 80 years, 52 years (-2818 to -2766) and 132 years respectively -see CUT chronology. So Djer's 84 years is WELL within the bounds of reality.

The Palermo Stone gives the following series of Kings in the view of CUT chronology. From Breasted;

First Dynasty King T = Djer (Breasted, p.57 line 92 is 6 months 7 days – in funny talk this is Peret III, day 7 cf. Wikipedia article re calendar entry (unspecifed) “death of Djer on Peret III, day 7” QED); King U = Kenkenes = Iti NB: from a DD of -3174 cf. Noah, 103 days drift brings us to -2762 the first year of a Kenkenes regnal count (Book of Sothis/Eus.); Lost kings (incl. Den = Usaphais = Zemti etc); King V = Djet (Uennephes =Ita);

Second Dynasty King Neterimu = Banetjeru = Binothris; Lost kings; King W = Chaires = Kara; King X = Djadjay.

These lead us to point out that Wikipedia on Den includes a portion of Palermo Stone 28^th...41^st year which belong to Uenephes as 28^th -2743, 29^th -2742 etc. The thirty-one years could possibly be thirty-two years. Any budding post-docs? This is also Athothis II of Eratosthenes.

The Abydos King List remains intact;

Menes -2873 to -2811

Teti -2813 to -2743

Iti -2784 to -2714

Ita -2770 to -2700

Septi (Zemti) -2749 to -2679

Meribiap -2705 to -2631

Semsu -2719 to -2647

Qebeh -2671 to -2601

Sakkhara King List is intact;

Miebis -2705 to -2631

Kourodes -2671 (-2664) to -2601

To reconcile Eus./and Armenian recension we have the following;

Eus. 297 years, and 549 from “beginning” Arm. 298 years

Dealing with 549 years. Mestraim in Book of Sothis is equated to Menes. CUT puts Mestraim/Menes at -2846. Therefore we can sum -2846 + 549 to -2297 or Tosorthros of Eus/Afr. Dynasty #3 in CUT chronology.

The 297 of Eus. is Kebh as the first Dynasty #2 king (remember Eus. is a pest of a pedant) or -2664 + 297 = -2367 or the end of Bebty, in CUT chronology, and also the end of the royal line.

The Armenian recension of Eus. has -2646 (giving the whole year -2647 to -2646 as -2646) to -2348 (-2646+298=-2348) or the end of Nebka – some regard this at the end of Dynasty #2 for whatever reason.

That's it for our revision to date for Dynasty One of Egypt.
PS It is possible that Djer is Kenkenes = Iti.  He would have started his sed regnal count with Aha = Teti = Athothis' keyed sed in -2784.  Nothing particularly stands in the way of a -2705 end as opposed to -2714.  In this way we can validate king Qa'a seal list of kings i.e.  Narmer, Aha, Djer, Djet, Den, Anedjib, Semerkhet and Qáa from Ottar Vendel's great website Ottar Vendel Sun Dec 21, 11:26AM
 Menes -2873 to -2811, Athothis -2813 to -2754, Kenkenes -2762 to -2723, Uenephes -2754 to -2700, Usaphais -2710 to -2690, Miebis -2690 to -2671, Semempses -2664 to -2646, Bieneches -2649 to -2621/and validate king Den's list of kings i.e. Narmer, Aha, Djer, Djet, Den, Meretneit
 Menes -2873 to -2811, Athothis -2813 to -2754, Kenkenes -2762 to -2723, Uenephes -2754 to -2700, Usaphais -2723 to -2718, Merneith -2781 to -2711